My opinions about E-commerce

This is why e-commerce is so difficult because making a powerful e-commerce website costs so much money in advanced cybersecurity and it costs so much money to train and hire cybersecurity people, that it's better for things to be funneled into very good website stores. (Walmart/Amazon/etc,). I suggest less wifi, better security practices in corporations and remember that cybersecurity can run up to huge budgets very quickly. The nation needs to adapt to cybersecurity practices because it's easier to hack than be secure.

food disributing is working well also through the grocery store chains (Lowe's/Food Lion) online. Electronics has 5-8 websites, but still every single security officer is worth minimum of 60-80k and it's rare skill that is difficult to increase supply and the workforce is rather political.

Small businesses are literally being a cripple by not following amazon's/Walmart retailer policies also, and I have rejected businesses that have had their Amazon accounts shut down.

Amazon right now has too much power over the economy representing 60% of all e-commerce there needs to be a judicial commerce court just for amazon deciding that they are a private company that has dictator powers over people's accounts.

The difference between auto quotes and amazon. Is that auto quotes supports small business fixtures and general stores by increasing their product inventory), Amazon is a "kill all" model that put everyone out of business when he moved out of books. The cellphone business is nice, but I would appreciate him partnering with small business stores more and not being such a commercial dominator. I use amazon when I am really busy working and I need a tool basically I am a prime member.

If you government employees ever wanted to heal this country is to buy into autoquotes and have an "ethical" e-commerce business strategy with de-centralized business.

My opinion about the pope saying "Thou Shalt not Frack"

Pope Francis is saying that "Thou Shalt not Frack", the problem with drilling is they accuse people of poisoning the water.  When the Ensign United States Drilling + Halliburton makes a hole, they make a pilot hole first to determine the layers of sediment in the earth. Once the sediment tables are determined, then about 150 directional holes are drilling (about 4 holes per pad) in an area.  The casing is a huge tube of steel that is put into the ground below the water table, it takes about 4-6 hours for the 2 crews to lay in the casing, then cement is poured on the outside of the pipe, that keeps the pipe solid and linked together.

That corporation rode me harder than any other work out there, they almost broke me down every day I almost collapsed from exhaustion every day after work. 

Once the casing is in the ground, the drilling continues to 7000-1000ft, and then once the 4 holes are drilled with direction tools in different directions to cover more square area.   once the drilling rig work is complete, a "workover" rig comes out there, and lays a perforated pipe into the ground, that allows the gas to collect from the pipe.  I personally am not sure about the fluids injected at 7000-10000ft because it is a closely guarded industrial secret from Halliburton, but I am sure that it is so deep that it does not come into contact with the water supply, and if done properly with American technology, it is safe for hte people who live off of well water.

China vs. US conflict over Taiwan/Formosa Strait

This is an almost 100-year conflict, which made a lot of sense when there was so much currency difference between the mercantile British and the Imperial American government who both had powerful navies to secure Taiwan's independence.  The Taiwanese government has failed in a land invasion with standard firearms or any kind of beach landing already.

The militarization and modernization of the Chinese army are going to give them dangerous military capabilities in which in a war similar to all the others, which has lacked public support over these imperial wars.  Dissidence over the imperial American wars has gone back to 1899 with Mark Twain's protesting the Philippine invasions, which was a waste of time and money, and colonization of the Philippines. 

It is possible to defeat China in a major conflict by knocking out the industrial factories producing the components for war machines and such, however, it is a lot easier for the United States to retreat to Guam/Hawaii at this point to continue to dominate in naval wars if necessary, and not bother on land invasions because they are so much more expensive.  Wars over the horizon are the normal now and it is much easier to fight on the ocean.

The USA can engineer materials overtime to raise the distance of aircraft to 7,000-10,000 miles to round trip into the heart of China to hit mapped outbuildings.  However a land war is costly, so the only thing that can be achieved is disarmament and deterrence of China.  Any real war with China the current voting population of Taiwan who supports non-reunification is ~5,000,000 and this is not nearly the number needed to defeat the PRC and they do not reproduce population fast enough because of the inequality of the capitalist system causes polygamy and lack of population growth, to fight in a future war. 

A good option in this situation is any of these 5,000,000 people who are unwilling to live under Chinese rule should be allowed to immigrate to America and just empty out the Island, and allow the Island to lose its economic productivity as a cheaper and safer alternative the USA could import a major "Tiger" and gain this GDP in the SW or NW or even BC, Canada.  The pacific ocean is a powerful deterrent on its own and the USA owns the pacific ocean and it's very difficult to fight the USA to Hawaii.  Consider my suggestions.